Call Us Today
Call Us Today
For years, Sig Sauer has marketed its P320 and M18 handguns as safe, reliable firearms trusted by law enforcement, military personnel, and civilians. However, hundreds of gun owners across the United States allege that these pistols can fire without anyone pulling the trigger — sometimes with devastating consequences.
In 2025, this controversy escalated as more lawsuits, government actions, and law enforcement bans were announced against the firearms manufacturer. Victims claim that defective design has caused catastrophic injuries and even deaths. Many victims and families are now turning to the courts for justice.
At Kherkher Garcia, our product liability attorneys are following these developments closely. We represent individuals harmed by defective products, including firearms, and we are committed to helping victims recover compensation for their injuries and losses.
Contact Our Houston Product Liability Lawyers
The Sig Sauer P320, introduced in 2014, quickly became one of America’s most popular handguns. The pistol’s modular design and smooth trigger pull made it a favorite among gun owners. It was even adopted by the U.S. Army as the M17/M18 service pistol.
However, not long after its release, reports began to surface that the P320 could discharge without a trigger pull, often while holstered or being handled safely. Victims — including law enforcement officers, military members, and private citizens — reported being shot in the leg, hip, or abdomen when their firearm allegedly went off unexpectedly.
Although Sig Sauer has maintained that the P320 is safe and that no recall is warranted, hundreds of incidents have been reported nationwide. Multiple courts have found that evidence of potential design flaws should be examined by juries, including:
In October 2025, the State of New Jersey filed a landmark lawsuit against Sig Sauer, alleging that the company knowingly sold defective handguns that could fire on their own. The lawsuit claims Sig Sauer falsely advertised the P320 as safe despite internal evidence of unintended discharges. The state is seeking to ban further P320 sales, require a recall, and impose penalties for consumer fraud. This marks the first state-level lawsuit against the gunmaker. This lawsuit signals a growing wave of institutional accountability.
A significant federal court decision in August 2025 revived a case filed by a former U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officer who was shot in the leg when his holstered P320 discharged during training. The Third Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that expert testimony regarding the pistol’s design defects should not have been excluded, allowing the officer’s case to proceed. This ruling could strengthen similar lawsuits pending nationwide.
No Fees Unless We WinGet In Touch With Us
713-333-1030
Growing concern over safety has led several police departments to pull Sig Sauer pistols from service. The Houston Police Department, for instance, banned the P320 in 2025 after an officer was seriously injured in a reported accidental discharge. A federal judge also ordered the Chicago Police Department to phase out the weapons after a Union request.
The Washington State Criminal Justice Training Commission has permanently banned the use of the P320 in all training facilities. Additionally, the U.S. Air Force Global Strike Command temporarily halted use of the M18 variant following the death of an airman, pending investigation and inspection of the weapons.
These actions underscore that even agencies with rigorous firearm safety protocols have lost confidence in the weapon’s safety.
As of 2025, more than 100 lawsuits have been filed nationwide alleging unintentional discharges. A March 2025 filing included 22 new plaintiffs from 16 states, all claiming similar incidents of the P320 firing without trigger input.
Courts have issued mixed rulings – some dismissals, some jury verdicts in favor of victims. Notably, in 2024 a Georgia jury awarded $2.35 million to a man injured when his P320 fired from his holster, and appellate courts have since upheld the finding of defect.
Sig Sauer continues to deny that the P320 is defective, insisting that it “cannot fire without a trigger pull.” The company attributes these incidents to user error, faulty holsters, or mishandling.
Despite mounting lawsuits and institutional bans, Sig Sauer has not issued a recall or significant design modification to existing models.
If you or a loved one has been injured by a firearm that discharged unintentionally, you should contact an experienced product liability attorney immediately.
Cases involving firearms are complex. Manufacturers often have teams of lawyers and expert witnesses prepared to dispute liability. Victims must act quickly to preserve evidence, such as the firearm, holster, and any ballistics data, to build a strong case. A knowledgeable product liability attorney can help:
Without skilled representation, victims risk losing their right to full compensation or may face challenges proving the defect caused the discharge.
No Fees Unless We WinGet In Touch With Us
713-333-1030
At Kherkher Garcia, we have decades of experience holding negligent manufacturers accountable. Our firm represents victims nationwide in product liability and catastrophic injury cases. When it comes to defective firearms, our attorneys:
We understand the trauma caused by unexpected firearm injuries. Whether you are a law enforcement officer, a military veteran, or a private citizen, our legal team stands ready to help you seek justice and hold Sig Sauer accountable for any negligence that contributed to your injuries.
Many users claim that Sig Sauer’s P320 and M18 handguns can discharge without the trigger being pulled, especially when holstered or handled safely.
Most claims involve the P320 series and its military variant, the M18.
No. Despite ongoing litigation and reports of injuries, the company has not issued a voluntary recall for the P320.
Victims have suffered gunshot wounds to the leg, hip, abdomen, and groin, resulting in permanent disability or death.
Anyone injured by an unintentional discharge involving a Sig Sauer handgun may be eligible to file a product liability or negligence claim. Additionally, surviving family members may be eligible to file a wrongful death claim if death occurs.
Yes. Many plaintiffs are police officers, federal agents, and military members who experienced accidental discharges while performing official duties.
Compensation in a Sig Sauer lawsuit may include medical bills, lost wages, pain and suffering, disability, emotional distress, and in some cases, punitive damages. Damages available in lawsuits vary depending on the facts of the case.
Contact Our Personal Injury Attorneys in Texas
Deadlines vary by state, but most states have two to three years from the date of injury to file a lawsuit.
An experienced product liability attorney can prove defect, preserve evidence, and negotiate or litigate against large corporations like Sig Sauer.
You can call our office or contact us online for a free, confidential consultation. We will review your case and explain your options for pursuing justice.
If you have been injured by a firearm that discharged unexpectedly, you are not alone. The attorneys at Kherkher Garcia are investigating Sig Sauer-related injury claims nationwide. Our experienced legal team is ready to help you understanding your potential case and your legal rights. If you have an actionable claim, we will help you pursue compensation and hold negligent manufacturers accountable.
Contact Kherkher Garcia today for a free consultation to learn more about your rights and options after a Sig Sauer injury. Call us at 713-333-1030, or complete our online contact form to get started.
Image by aleksandarlittlewolf on Freepik
Steve Kherkher is passionate about serving his clients. He has dedicated his life to championing the rights of those who have experienced catastrophic injury due to negligence. Steve Kherkher, along with Trial Lawyer Jesus Garcia, founded Kherkher Garcia, and under their leadership, the firm achieved unprecedented success within its first three years. With a career spanning over 35 years, Steve’s tireless pursuit of justice for his clients has earned him national recognition and numerous accolades as an exemplary trial attorney.Steve Kherkher
FOUNDING PARTNER AND 35+ YEAR TRIAL LAWYER
This page has been written, edited, and reviewed by a team of legal writers following our comprehensive editorial guidelines. This page was approved by attorneys Steve Kherkher and Jesus Garcia Jr., who have more than 50 years of combined legal experience championing the rights of those who have experienced catastrophic injury due to negligence.
Connect with a Kherkher Garcia trial lawyer today to pursue maximum compensation for your injury.
Call Us 713-333-1030 
Message Us 
Call Us